Louis Pojman’s Ethics: Discovering Right and Wrong Essays -- Utilitari

Utilitarianism is a theory which states that the purpose of deterrent exampleity is to pass maximal goodness in a society. It is consequentialist sort of than deontological in that the moral value of ethical decisions are to be judged in terms of their effects, rather than the ingrained properties of the acts themselves. Those effects are deemed good which generate the most pastime or happiness, or which minimize overall pain. There are deuce classical types of utilitarianism which allow be under our consideration act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism. Two dissents to utilitarianism leave alone be examined, as well as Louis Pojmans answers to those objections in morality Discovering Right and Wrong. It will be shown that Pojman presents an adequate defense of utilitarianism, and that utilitarianism succeeds as a worthwhile moral theory. Act-Utilitarianism is the thesis that an act is right if and nevertheless if it results in as much good as any available option (Pojman 110). One conspicuous problem with the thesis is that it suggests that correct moral actions will often clash with our intuitions about basic moral norms. For example, Pojman refers to Richard Brandts review article in which he points out that the act-utilitarian seems to be committed to helping the impoverished above ones own family, repaying debts only if there is no better use for the money, and ending the lives of those who are a drain on others (Pojman 110). Rule-Utilitarianism is a response to this objection and an attempt to formulate a to a greater extent plausible conception of the theory. Pojmans definition is An act is right if and only if it is required by a rule that is itself a member of a set of rules whose acceptance would lead to greater utility for society tha... ... much difficult objections can be countered in various ways. The no-rest objection isnt defeating, since leisure can be incorporated into the moral rules. The umpire objectio n has two responses one of defeat, the other of integration. I have found the response of defeat (that justice can be overridden) to be unsatisfactory, since justice is an intrinsic good that is absolutely necessary for human flourishing. The conciliatory approach to the justice objection seeks to integrate justice into the higher level rules. I have in mind that this is a credible utilitarian position. It captures the importance of justice in our moral reasoning and legitimates utilitarianism as a moral theory without sacrificing the principles of consequentialism nor utility.Works CitedPojman, Louis P. moral philosophy Discovering Right and Wrong. 5th edition. Thomson Nelson. Toronto 2005.