Rehabilitation :: Legal Issues, Drug Courts, Probation

footnote cites the National Academy of Sciences stating that replacement is any plotted intervention that reduces an offenders further criminal activity ( pushchair 251). Walker breaks down rehabilitation models into two groups, the new and the old groups. The new groups that Walker suggests may have some positive hope be reentry programs, and do medicines courts. The old groups include probation, parole, and other reintegration programs. Worrall has a similar definition of rehabilitation, stating that rehabilitation consist of a planned intervention intended to change way (Worrall 40). He similarly assesses several of these programs and reaches similar conclusions as Walker.Drug courts ar specialized courts that focus on substance abuse. Generally offenders are offered the aspect at skipping prison or jail sentences if they successfully complete a substance abuse treatment program (Walker 275). Walker assesses drug courts, when they are well managed and designed carefully, a s being promising as perchance lowering recidivism (Walker 277). Worrall reached similar conclusions, stating that while much of the research into the strongness of drug courts has suffered from design limitations, they have shown reductions in recidivism (Worrall 168). Reentry programs try and take a clear look at sending prisoners hold into society after revamped educational and counseling programs (Walker 363). Unfortunately there is not a lot of exhibit that these programs reduce recidivism rates (Walker 363) Walker concludes that the evidence is inconclusive, programs are in their archean stages, and more research is indispensable due to the current crisis of so some(prenominal) prisoners being released (Walker 363).Probation is where offenders receive supervision and treatment in the community quite than in a correctional setting (Walker 255). Walker assesses probation as necessary and appropriate for many offenders. However he also state that close to probation prog rams fail, and that there is no evidence that one probation program is more effective than another (Walker 257). This is due to several reasons, first probationers largely receive no treatment, only supervision, and even this supervision is often very intermittent, and there are quality control issues with both treatments and supervision (Walker 256). Parole is the most undefiled example of a reintegration program, and it involves releasing a prisoner early back into the community, usually under some type of treatment and supervision, similar to probation (Walker 257). likewise trying to rehabilitate offenders, parole also serves several other purposes, such as giving prisoners an incentive to behave well, giving the corrections dust a tool to control prisoners, and serves as a way to deal out with prison overcrowding (Walker 257).